19 Nov 2023: At GR’s invitation they introduced themselves; their skills and experience were noted and all were thanked for their support. ... In terms of what made Marjon special, its friendly atmosphere, approachability of lecturers, provision of specialist

7 Apr 2021: RW invited fellow governors to join him in expressing thanks and appreciation to all Marjon’s staff and students. ... He paid tribute to RW and his team for all they had achieved.

13 Mar 2023: MAIN MEETING – all in attendance 4. Welcome, Apologies & Declaration of Conflicts of Interests 4.1 Opening the main part of the meeting, Committee Chair, Emma van der Lugt, welcomed. ... colleagues. 4.2 No apologies were received; all members were in

18 Oct 2021: MAIN MEETING – all in attendance. 4. Welcome, Apologies & Declaration of Conflicts of Interests 4.1 Opening the main part of the meeting, Committee Chair, Emma van der Lugt, welcomed colleagues. ... This reflected a continuing evolution around audit

15 Jul 2022: MJ outlined further potential to be realised, around growth, upskilling and place/space initiatives, all of which were rooted in the University’s values and reflected the transformative power of education ... 6.3 GR requested BoG’s support in

24 Jun 2020: 3. Matters arising 3.1 All matters arising were considered complete. 4.

8 Apr 2022: RW noted that all amendments were in line with advice received from the University’s legal advisors, Womble Bond Dickinson and that of HE Shared Legal.

21 Nov 2022: MAIN MEETING – all in attendance 4. Welcome, Apologies & Declaration of Conflicts of Interests 4.1 Opening the main part of the meeting, Committee Chair, Emma van der Lugt, welcomed. ... these. 5.21 The Committee paid credit to the Governance

1 Dec 2022: 3.6 WM wished RW all the best in his retirement and flagged the importance of providing. ... 7.21 The Chair’s Annual Report (Appendix A) was noted. GR thanked all members of BoG for having taken the time to discuss with him individually the

25 Mar 2023: All queries had been resolved or were being followed through to the Committee’s and External Auditors’ satisfaction and consequently a clean opinion on the workings of the University had gone